Comments on: Would You Vote For A Candidate That Wants National Health Care?

By: Randy B

Randy B — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:36:10 +0000

My vote goes to the one that will keep out the illegal scum.

By: Dr Jello

Dr Jello — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:42:55 +0000

Never. Why? Do I think some bureaucrat knows my health requirements better than me and my doctor?
If the answer is no, then there no reason to want national health care. This is only my business.

By: Henry VIII

Henry VIII — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:40:57 +0000

Let’s wait and see what happens. You seem to think that Pharma is their sole source of campaign donations. Maybe they won’t cow tow to the donors and do the right thing anyway. Whatever happens we still have a health care crisis in this country that we are going to have to solve now or later. The longer we wait the worse it is going to get.
Another thought. Perhaps Clinton and Obama are already convinced we need health care reform and Romney needs more convincing. By the way for companies as big as pharma. $140,000 is a drop in the bucket.

By: Bluesman

Bluesman — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:13:58 +0000

YES!

By: Myron

Myron — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:57:05 +0000

No. Besides, the Dems “national health care” pitch is a scam, an attempt at taking control of of a large, critical part of the government. That’s a big step toward destroying capitalism and forcing socialism onto America.
GIVING something to someone who makes no effort to get it for themselves i.e. THE AMERICAN ENTITLEMNENT SYSTEM, which ideally would give all our wealth away to the whole friggin’ world, is the fast track to fourth world status.
Except for Hillary. She’d be privileged, rich, whatever the f she wanted to be, just like the bigshots who ran the Politburo in the now defunct USSR.

By: utahmike

utahmike — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:16:23 +0000

Nope. If there is national health care watch your taxes go sky high. Endless waits for major surgery and doctors being told what they can charge. Guess what kind of treatment you are going to get if THAT happens? No thanks !! I prefer it in the private sector where it belongs with competition in what is known as the “Free Market System”.

By: Mr Pinhead, the no spinach zone

Mr Pinhead, the no spinach zone — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:17:18 +0000

Our Government officials are being paid off by pharmaceutical companies, so as to allow these companies to charge exuberant prices for their drugs. The elected officials are being paid off with cash and the promise of high paying jobs in these companies when their political careers are over. Also onlyte middle class are paying for medical, the poor plus illegals don’t have to pay, and the rich don’t care. We need a national health care system. n seconed thoughts I am not sure about the government running it it will be a mess in very short time.

By: Kyle

Kyle — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:38:44 +0000

BaBa Booey.

By: Butterfl

Butterfl — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:05:06 +0000

yes I would. I have MS a genetic diease that showed it’s ugly head when I was only 23 wtf I have no insurance because no one will cover me i have pre existing condition Had no insurance before diagnosed because who hell thinks they will get a diease like this in thier 20’s so national health care would help me greatly I can’t even afford my meds most months and my husband makes good money, we have two mortages on one house and live month to month all because of this stupid diease which i did nothing to cause or ask for but alls well because someday God will give us all perfect bodies

By: Craig C

Craig C — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:37:22 +0000

Absolutely NOT. It won’t work here just like it hasn’t worked in England, Canada, Cuba, etc…