If We Substitute “civil Rights” For “health Care Reform” Is The Debate Rhetoric And Substance Similar?
Does Economic Discrimination In Opposition To The Need For Health Care Reform Simulate The "Civil Rights" Model Of Ethical Protest? Is The Health Care Industry More Sophisticated Than "Jim Crow" Supporters?
Tags: "civil, Care, Debate, Health, Reform, Rhetoric, Rights", Similar, Substance, Substitute





January 8th, 2010 at 6:24 pm
I think you would have to be very creative to come up with comparisons.
January 8th, 2010 at 7:43 pm
No. You see, no one is denied the right to health care right now. You can go into a hospital and pay for whatever services you wish. I don’t recall it ever being a right to get someone else’s products and/or services for free.
And actually, there are free clinics out there along with nonprofit organizations that help those who are in need but can’t afford care.
January 8th, 2010 at 11:42 pm
In the 1960′s Republicans passed civil rights legislation over the heads of the Democrats. Today, Democrats are passing Slavery legislation (Health Care) over the heads of the American people. The aim of the democrat party is to enslave the people to the government.
January 9th, 2010 at 3:11 am
No, it’s more like the health care reform supporters being like the flat earthers, and the ones who disagree are like Galileo.
Does that mean Galileo was racist because he said the earth is round and it orbits around the sun?
That seems to be what you’re saying.
January 9th, 2010 at 8:25 am
No, equal rights for all races and genders is the right thing to do. All men (and women) are created equal, right? It doesn’t cost the government money to extend equal rights to everyone. It does cost the government money for them to provide services.
January 9th, 2010 at 10:34 am
in my mind having the government in complete and total control of the health care industry would not be a good thing. There is no similarity to the current “health care reform” and the civil rights issue.
January 9th, 2010 at 1:15 pm
You dont have a right to someones else’s services bottom line. You saying it is a right is saying you have a right to medical professionals labor. The Constitution outlawed slavery long ago. Get with the times.
January 9th, 2010 at 1:33 pm
Again it is a public OPTION. The government isn’t taking over the whole health care system. It is as if we only got our mail from UPS or Fedex, which is really expensive. Throw in the USPS and then presto, cheaper mail.
January 9th, 2010 at 4:03 pm
America is a Capitalist Society. If you want government controlled private sectors (such as health care), move to Canada.
January 9th, 2010 at 9:52 pm
There is no right to the property or services of others.